PCR-test and Asymptomatic infection

RT-PCR test – does it deserve to be hailed as “The Gold Standard”?

The test method used as “The Gold Standard” all over the world is the RT-PCR test. It has long been questioned if the method can be used to diagnose Covid-19. The sceptics are professional doctors and scientists. 

This is the method which is used as argument for lockdown, wearing of masks, curfew etc. Please look at the following documents, and reflect on the matter. 

“Collective evolution” writes:

WHO Calls Into Question Ability of RT-PCR Test To Detect COVID-19 (False Positives)

IN BRIEF

  • The Facts:The World Health Organization recently put up a notice on their website expressing how PCR tests may not be entirely accurate when it comes to detecting COVID-19 cases.
  • Reflect On:Why are so many doctors and scientists who oppose the measures being taken by multiple governments never given a chance to share their opinions in front of millions, like Dr. Anthony Fauci is, for example.
What Happened: On December 14th the World Health Organization (WHO) released a notice on their website titled “WHO Information Notice for IVD Users” regarding “nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2.” In it they state that people who test positive for COVID-19 may not actually have COVID-19, known as false positives. They state the following,
WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.As with any diagnostic procedure, the positive and negative predictive values for the product in a given testing population are important to note. As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases. This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc.
Read more …


Off-guardian.org writes:

The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.

While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?

The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.

This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.

(…)

This has all been public knowledge since the beginning of the lockdown. The Australian government’s own website admitted the tests were flawed, and a court in Portugal ruled they were not fit for purpose.

Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “dead nucleotides”, not a living virus.

Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s.

So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality?

The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical: We have a vaccine now. We don’t need false positives anymore.

Notionally, the system has produced its miracle cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+.

Lo and behold, the number of “positive cases” will plummet, and we’ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works.

After months of flooding the data pool with false positives, miscounting deaths “by accident”, adding “Covid19 related death” to every other death certificate…they can stop. The create-a-pandemic machine can be turned down to zero again.

…as long as we all do as we’re told. Any signs of dissent – masses of people refusing the vaccine, for example – and the CT value can start to climb again, and they bring back their magical disease.

Click to read the whole article 

That the authorities all over the world still ignores this is not surprising. I guess they think that people in general have accepted this as a fact so that no matter what the WHO writes, the myth is settled that the PCR test is valid, and that we have to be very cautious because the number of cases is still way too high. 

“Public Health England” (government) also writes about the PCR test’s unreliability because it may report false positives

Immunocompetent staff, patients and residents who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR should be exempt from routine re-testing by PCR or LFD antigen tests (for example, repeated whole setting screening or screening prior to hospital discharge) within a period of 90 days from their initial illness onset or test (if asymptomatic) unless they develop new COVID-19 symptoms. This is because fragments of inactive virus can be persistently detected by PCR in respiratory tract samples following infection – long after a person has completed their isolation period and is no longer infectious.

Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-management-of-exposed-healthcare-workers-and-patients-in-hospital-settings/covid-19-management-of-exposed-healthcare-workers-and-patients-in-hospital-settings

But, this does not affect the policies of health authorities and governments around the world one single bit. They keep on warning about concerningly high numbers of daily cases of infection which force us to still keeping social distance, wear masks, not open society too much etc. This inevitably leads me to

Conclusion (III)

The “Pandemic” really is a “PCR-demic”. The authorities have managed to make us believe that the PCR test with 100% certainty tells if a person is infected or not with Sars Cov-2 (some scientists are even concerned if the test gives false negatives, i.e. shows too few positives). And “they” will uphold this as the truth as long as we the people believe that it’s bad science to question the validity of the PCR tests. Dr. Vernon Coleman elaborates on it in this video:

Asymptomatic infection

An argument for the mass testing, lockdown, and other measures is that people who don’t have symptoms may be infected, and they may infect other people. If the PCR-test did not deliver false positives, this problem would not exist. I will here present two stances, and you may judge for yourself.

The official stance as mentioned is that asymptomatic infection is a possibility, and because of this every person who is tested positive of Covid a risk to other people in terms of spreading the virus. A Danish study at the Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics at the University of Aarhus tells that

“Researchers worldwide have been surprised to see that individuals can be infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus – the virus that produces COVID-19 without showing symptoms. Since these individuals expose others to infection without knowing it, it is important to find an explanation and hopefully a solution to this.”

We must assume that the scientific researchers from Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital without hesitation accept that the PCR-test gives the correct results when virus molecules are either found or not found in the test. As such I would judge them to be on a not so secure ground since even the WHO has admitted that the PCR-test is not as trustworthy as one could wish. In addition they also assume that the asymptomatic infection exists. If they don’t question these two xxxx which are not established as facts since there is serious scientific debate about it, then how can you trust the result of the study? 

And then there is not more to say about this. I shall not go into the science of it, because I don’t know anything about it. Read the study for yourself here: https://mbg.au.dk/en/news-and-events/news-item/artikel/why-are-some-covid-19-infected-people-asymptomatic/

 

Then comes the question if there is any scientific evidence of the claim of asymptomatic infection. Let’s look at the opponents first.

The first witness, doctor Fauci is very clear and definite: 

In all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers. an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.

In addition to what he says in this video, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi says:

“There’s no documented case in the world where it has been shown that a severely diseased individual with COVID-19 pneumonia contracted this from a non-symptomatic individual, not a single case in the world.”

Source: https://lbry.tv/@Dryburgh:7/Sucharit-Bhakdi-Public-is-Being-Led-to-Their-Downfall

 

On June 8 2020 a spokesperson for WHO Maria van Kerkhove said that asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is very rare. The day after the WHO commented that much is still unknown. 

Source: YouTube video  The UGLY truth about the Covid-19 lockdowns – Nick Hudson, co-founder of PANDA. Watch this video below. 

 On January 28 2020 Anthony Fauci said “In all the history of respiratory-born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/asymptomatic-transmission-of-covid-19-didnt-occur-at-all-study-of-10-million-finds

This article builds its conclusions on a study in Wuhan of 10 million people.

A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people.

(…)

Commenting on the study, The Conservative Tree House noted that “all of the current lockdown regulations, mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.” The evidence presented in the study shows that “‘very rare’ actually means ‘never’ asymptomatic spread just doesn’t happen – EVER.”

Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked, Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER, as it should be “huge news,” paving the way “to open up everything immediately.” Yet media reports have been virtually nonexistent and “ignored,” a fact that Tucker explained: “The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.”

Conclusion (IV)


When the whole world continues with lockdown and all kinds of restrictions claiming that the spread of first The English mutation and then The South African and the Brazilian mutation etc. makes it impossible to open up society in spite of all the evidence shown above,
presented by WHO and Dr. Anthony Fauci plus doctors who have everything to lose in terms of professional credibility …

I can only conclude that the lockdowns and restrictions are held up by somebody who really have something to lose!

And based on the indications of this having been planned for years by a global elite, 

I have to conclude that it is exactly this elite aka World Economic Forum aka Klaus Schwab aka Bill Gates and many more plus big pharma who don’t want to lose the “iron fist grip” they have on governments, news media and populations all over the world. 

And this is another argument for not taking the vaccine. It is utterly unnecessary and even more since there is a serious risk of adverse effects, please refuse to take it!!

Besides, please read on – there are many more arguments for not taking the vaccine!