Several COVID-19 Vaccines Are Made Using Aborted Fetal Cells
- The claim made by some citizen journalists is that certain COVID-19 vaccines “contain cells from an aborted fetus.” One video headline stated: “CONFIRMED — aborted fetus in COVID-19 vaccine”
- Fact checkers have “debunked” these claims and labeled them false, in one instance because the name of the fetal cell line was incorrect and in others because the vaccines do not literally “contain” these cells; rather, the fetal cell lines were used as a growth medium for the virus during the production phase
- Fact checkers’ claim that fetal cells are not used in vaccine development because they are clones of the original is perhaps the most ludicrous. There’s no difference between cells growing and multiplying indefinitely in a petri dish and cells growing and multiplying in your body during your lifetime. If the cells in your body are still you, then the cells in the petri dish are still that of the original fetus that was aborted
- Aside from ethical concerns, some may also object to vaccines manufactured through the use of fetal cell lines on the basis that there may be health risks involved, due to potential DNA contamination. Human fetal cell lines in vaccine production have been linked to both autism and autoimmune diseases
- Vaccine makers using a fetal cell line in the development of their COVID-19 vaccines include AstraZeneca, Jansen Research and Development/Johnson & Johnson, CanSino Biologics, University of Pittsburgh, ImmunityBio and Altimmune
- Read more…
Different kinds of vaccines
The Pfizer/BioNtech and the Moderna vaccines are mRNA vaccines. They are highly experimental, and if you get vaccinated there is no guarantee that you are kept healthy months and years from now (you may get sick, you may get disabled, you may die?) And once you are vaccinated, you are in that state for life.
The AstraZenica and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are made with another technology, and are grown on human fetus cells as described in the article above.
Video "Vaccine - Not a Vaccine"
A summary of above video Top Medical Advisor “Vaccine – Not A Vaccine”
The main claim of the video is that the vaccine is not a vaccine, it is gene therapy technology.
When you think about a vaccine you expect
- The vaccine is going to keep you from being infected from a certain pathogen.
- When you get the vaccine you will not transmit the pathogen to other people. But this is not the case for the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines”.
Moderna made a point in stating that their technology is gene therapy technology, set up to be a cancer treatment.
They put together a synthetic fragment of nucleid acid. It’s not natural. The synthetic fragment is introduced into the cell embedded within a PEG carrier
(Please read a thorough explanation of what a PEG carrier is and the dangers associated with it, in this article https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/components-of-mrna-technology-could-lead-to-significant-adverse-events-in-one-or-more-of-our-clinical-trials-says-moderna/)
The aim is not to create immunity and not to block transmission of the virus, but to lessen symptoms. And it is associated with the s-1 spike protein, not even the virus itself.
What is a vaccine? The CDC has a two part definition: 1. Immunity is the protection from an infectious disease so that you can be exposed to the disease without becoming infected. Pfizer and Moderna do specifically not test the “vaccines” for this because that is not their definition. 2. A vaccine is a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity. This is the CDC definition. But it’s not the law.
This is an attempt to sketch up some of the main points in the articles and videos above. It is a matter which is very heavy with information, so please read the articles very slowly and thoroughly.
- The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer/BioNtech are actually not vaccines. They are a gene therapy technology.
- The “vaccine” is a synthetic fragment of nucleid acid. It is not natural.
- This synthetic component is introduced into the cells within a PEG carrier. This is very problematic. Please read about the dangers of PEG carriers: article https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/components-of-mrna-technology-could-lead-to-significant-adverse-events-in-one-or-more-of-our-clinical-trials-says-moderna/
- The 1905 Jacobson case at the Supreme Court in Massachusetts established that persons and property are subjected to restraints and burdens if there is a threat to the general comfort, health and prosperity of a state. The individual benefit is superseded by the collective benefit. And in the case of an epidemic the collective benefit would be that the population does not get infected with the pathogen and that the pathogen is not being transmitted. This means that when this is secured the police has the power and admission to impose restrictions upon the population, such as we see in the present restrictions against Covid-19 spread.
- The “vaccine” is not doing what a vaccine shall do: create immunity against the sickness so that a vaccinated person does not get infected by exposure to the pathogen and 1. prevent the spread of the infection from the vaccinated to other people. The vaccines from Moderna are actually not tested for either of this. That is not part of their definition!! The vaccines are only meant to lessen the symptoms associated with the s-1 spike protein (spikes=protrusions), not the virus itself. Moderna has explicitly said that it was impractical to measure infection when they tested the vaccination product. So, there is no evidence inside the clinical trials that the gene therapy has anything to do with the infection or not. This means that the vaccines are not really vaccines!
- The WHO and the CDC in February 2020 made a clear distinction: The Covid-19 is a series of clinical symptoms like fever, muscle pain, aches, loss of smell, certain radiologic findings in the lungs. The WHO and the CDC were very clear on that it is not a disease. There is no causality between the virus and the “disease” because 80% of those tested positive for the infection did not have any problems. So, it is merely a series of symptoms.
- The primary endpoint for the vaccine trial was not a vaccine endpoint. A vaccine endpoint has to do with immunity and with transmissibility. Neither of those were measured. Moderna stated that the vaccine should prevent the severe Covid-19 disease and prevent infection by SARS-CoV-2. According to Moderna’s clinical study it was impractical to measure infection. So there is no evidence that the gene therapy has anything to do with the infection or not of SARS-CoV-2.
- Quote from New England Journal of Medicine, October: “At the time of this writing no correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 has been established”. The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine in December: “No existing vaccines have been shown to be effective against infection with any betacoronavirus, the family that includes SARS-CoV-2, which causes Covid-19.”
- As recently as 2018 Moderna was insisting they were not making vaccinations, they made gene therapy technology. Suddenly, courtesy SARS-CoV-2 it became a vaccine company. Anyway, it is still today a company producing unproven gene therapy technology! What follows is not facts, but the opinion of David Martin. If Pfizer, Moderna, Fauci and others called it a gene therapy technology chemotherapy people would not want to take it. Because experimental gene therapy is a bad idea no matter who it is, when it is, no matter where it is. Experimental gene therapy should not relentlessly and recklessly be distributed to a population. The second reason he thinks it has to do with the liability exclusion of 1986. As long as the state of emergency is kept the companies are shielded by the liability act, so they are making millions of dollars on the back of something they have no liability for. If the state of emergency is suspended there would be no liability shield for the medical companies. Because there is not a liability shield under the 1986 act for a medical countermeasure that is gene therapy. ‘
- David Martin goes on in his conjectures that the governors, and health human services, and the CDC are maintaining the illusion of emergency because it maintains the illusion of the liability shield. The moment, he says, that the state of emergency is suspended, the use of RT-PCR tests will be impossible, because the test is not diagnostic. It has never been approved and it does not and cannot diagnose a disease. It is a deceptive practice, and you do not have a waiver of liability under deceptive practices even in a state of emergency!
What happens now after the vaccinations have started?
To a start it is stated that less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to the government in USA.
For the two weeks end of December through to January 13 7.844 cases including 183 deaths have been reported.
If you need written proof for the claims in the video, it is here:
References • It is unlawful under the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq., to advertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made. • Definition of Vaccine https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm • Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
In the video below Dr David Martin gives a shorter summary of it all.
Let’s look a bit at what some very influential people have said.
Dr. Anthony Fauci
Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical advisor to the American president in early 2017 said
“There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” Fauci said during a speech at Georgetown University, adding, “the thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we’re going to see this in the next few years.” Fauci specifically singled out the risks posed by unknown diseases, in addition to those from existing or reemergent ones. Fighting infectious diseases, he said, is a “perpetual challenge.”
He could say so with some sort of confidence since the world had already seen a number of virus outbreaks since year 2000. Each year had a numerous local outbreak of virus mainly in Asia, Africa, and besides this there were the outbreaks in the US which can be seen here: https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/2000.html.
Anyway it has often been noted as a bit sensational that he had predicted a specific challenge during Trump’s four year presidential period. How could he know?
And there is more. Watch this strange “slip of the tounge” or whatever it is:
I HAVE NO SYMPTOMS THERES NO REASON FOR ME TO TAKE A PCR TEST
Did he really say that? I don’t doubt it is Fauci on the video saying this, but in one sentence he sweeps away THE foundational argument for testing and keeping lockdown and all the restrictions which is “Asymptomatic persons may be infected and transmit the virus to others”.
President Barack ObamaIn 2014 President Barack Obama gave the following statement:
There may and likely will come a time in which we have an airborne disease that is .. deadly. And, in order for us to deal with that effectly we have to put in place an infrastructure – not just here at home, but globally that allows us to see it quickly, isolate it quickly, respond to it quickly.Later in this address he referenced to the 1918 pandemic, the Spanish Flu. When he had to go thus far back in history to find a comparable event why should he consider the coming years or decade to be a possible time for a new deadly pandemic? What did he know? Watch the video here: https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/04/10/barack-obama-2014-pandemic-comments-sot-ctn-vpx.cnn
EU President Ursula von der Leyen
“In the interview, Bill stated, with a smile, that humanity should prepare for the next pandemic “that will get attention this time.”
The Executive Chairman of The World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab in July 2020 published a book “The Great Reset” which is a reaction to the economic challenges the world is facing because of the Covid-19 virus outbreak and lockdowns. He writes that “We can emerge from this crisis a better world, if we act quickly and jointly”.
He addresses a need for a reset of the capitalistic economic model which according to him must cater for a radical action towards the consequences of the climate change, and “entirely new foundations for our economic and social systems”. Source: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/. One sentence which has been quoted several times is
“the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future.”
It is definitely necessary to do something to strengthen the global economy. Yes, we have an obligation to do so. But to call it an opportunity I would mean is something of a stretch. It is an opportunity in Klaus Schwab’s mind, and it is obvious that he himself wants to be a motor in this reset. But anyone else would call it an obligation which should be seen as a very urgent and difficult one.
When I think of the consequent way the economy has been under attack during this pandemic, I cannot help thinking that it is his plan to destroy the capitalist economy that we have seen in action full speed in 2020 and beyond.
To clarify, the consequent attack on the economy is manifested in mandated lock downs where small companies have had no other choice than bankruptcy.
Could they have done it better? Yes, they could. The argument for lockdown was to flatten the curve so that the hospitals were not pressed beyond capacity. But as I have already mentioned there are at least three proven medical treatments to prevent and heal the symptoms of Covid-19. But the health authorities all over the world would rather fill up the hospital beds and incubators and ultimately see people die than use these possibilities of treatment.
If that is not a consequent and aggressive way to ruin the economy, I don’t know what is. Besides this, lockdowns and social distancing would have been avoided if the wellbeing of the public was of paramount importance and not just a phrase.
In line herewith is this snippet from https://www.todayville.com/looking-behind-the-smoke-and-mirrors/
Most Canadians would be surprised to know that there are lawsuits and court cases pending against Prime (Crime) Minister Justin Trudeau (and his cronies) on a number of levels and a number of charges that include corruption and deception on Covid 19 responses. There is also a motion that includes private copyright on a national law!
Super Lawyer Rocco Galati is suing the Canadian government, Trudeau, Federal and Provincial Health Ministers, and others in the first of its kind supreme court lawsuit. His argument is fact and research based and he asserts that the extreme COVID Measures that have now been proven to cause 14 to 1 more deaths than the actual virus!
Rebel News reporter, Ezra Levant has covered this story in a hard-hitting report at:
A secondary site, globalresearch.ca has interviewed Galati at:
Just as many YouTube, Twitter and alternate news sources (NOT CONSPIRACY) have reported and documented, the Galati lawsuit has a long list of experts, data, and more to prove the case against the government.
Presently, a handful of countries including the United States and Germany have similar push back against extreme measures.
The very influential billionaire couple Bill and Melinda Gates have recently given some remarkable comments.
“Bill and Melinda Gates recently conducted an interview with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In the interview, Bill stated, with a smile, that humanity should prepare for the next pandemic “that will get attention this time.”
Some media outlets are reporting that he was referring to the upcoming potential second wave, but if you watch the full interview that doesn’t seem to be the case. Source https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/07/17/bill-gates-says-we-should-prepare-for-the-next-pandemic-that-will-get-attention-this-time/.
Does he predict another virus coming? In an interview with Business Insider Melinda Gates had this apparent slip of mouth:
“So no, we’re still a long way from herd immunity. And you can’t count on that because a lot of people are going to die in the meantime if you let the experiment run and you just let the disease run its course in communities.”
It is worth a thought or two that she calls the Covid-19 virus an experiment; “the experiment” seems to be synonymous to “the disease”.
This is a direct quote from Business Insider’s website. https://www.businessinsider.com/melinda-gates-coronavirus-interview-vaccine-timeline-2020-4
At another website the interview seems to be unedited:
“a lot of people are going to die in the meantime if you let the experiment run [ahem, I mean…] and you just let the disease run its course in communities.”
https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/04/14/melinda-gates-calls-coronavirus-the-experiment/ I have not been able to verify that she caught herself in saying “the experiment” and correct herself.
March 3 2015 Bill Gates said in a TED talk:
If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus. If we start now we can be ready for the next epidemic.
In 2018 Bill Gates repeated the warning
“A global pandemic is ON IT’S WAY. An ENGINEERED VIRUS is humanities greatest threat. This will happen in the NEXT DECADE.”
Bill and Melinda Gates recently conducted an interview with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In the interview, Bill stated, with a smile, that humanity should prepare for the next pandemic “that will get attention this time.” Some media outlets are reporting that he was referring to the upcoming potential second wave, but if you watch the full interview that doesn’t seem to be the case.
He did also in 2010 and in 2017 talk about how unprepared the world was for a pandemic.
Similarly to the case of Anthony Fauci the question has to be asked – how could he know?
Also in 2018 a warning came from Melinda Gates:
“A bioterrorist event could spread so quickly, and we are so unprepared for it,” she told Vox founder Ezra Klein in an interview at South by Southwest over the weekend.
“Think of the number of people who leave New York City every day and go all over the world — we’re an interconnected world.”
In an interview uploaded February 4. Bill Gates was asked “What is the next disaster? What is the one that we’re not prepared for?”
Also, related to pandemics is something people don’t like to talk about much which is bioterrorism, that somebody who wants to cause damage could engineer a virus and so that means the cost the chance of running into this is more than just the naturally cost epidemics like the current one.
If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war.
On the one hand it can be said that the world has seen virus outbreaks since the biggest one in modern history – HIV, and thus it is not foreign to an investigative mind to be concerned about future pandemics. On the other hand Bill Gates has found a big investment opportunity in vaccines, and he has been working for the eradicating of polio in India, so, at least he can here be seen to promote himself as “The virus go-to-man”. And again – How does he know with such certainty?
The threat of bioterrorism with an engineered virus; hmmm? For years it has been said that a scenario for a future terrorist attack could involve a “dirty a bomb”: a regular bomb filled with radioactive material. This has not happened yet, and the Gates’ fantasies could just as well be fuelled by their own participation in the current “corona-terrorist-attack”.
Let’s sum it up
Apparantly there is a “club of influential leaders” who know even as much about future events on the earth as the weatherman on TV knows about meteorological events – or even as much as God knows about the future!
But is that possible?
The weatherman can project weather patterns into the future. God says in the Bible that He tells His secrets to his friends – His prophets. Are they God’s friends? Are they prophets of God?
But the general rule among ordinary earthlings is that our knowledge about the future is limited to what we ourselves have planned to happen!
So, what is at stake here?
Judge for yourself!
The late David Rockefeller advocated for a New World Order. Boomerang Jack April 20th, 2020 wrote
“I’m an advocate for open discussion, always better than hidden agendas. This is why I appreciate a quote from David Rockefeller that openly reveals the goals of the elites.
In 1994, Rockefeller was quoted at a U.N. dinner as saying, “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller wrote in his 2002 memoirs:
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
If history does not produce this needed crisis by itself it would be necessary to create one, don’t you think? And when Rockefeller was proud of being a conspirator, I could suspect that he could have a finger in the planning of the crisis we are in the middle of. Is that too far off?
As we’ve shown in previous exposes, the whole Covidiocracy is a masquerade and a simulation long prepared by The World Bank / IMF / The Rothschilds / World Economic Forum (basically the world’s “elite”, the 0.1%) and their lemmings, with Rockefeller partnership.
Our newest discoveries further these previous revelations.
In 2015 a ‘System and Method for Testing for COVID-19′ was patented by Richard Rothschild, with a Dutch government organisation.
Did you catch that? In 2015 – four years before the disease even existed – a testing method for COVID-19 was developed.
First Registration of Covid-19: Netherlands, Oct. 13, 2015
It’s Not an Epidemic, it is An Operation
from Behind the News Network
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (slip of the tongue) tacitly admits in a somewhat contradictory statement that COVID-19 is a “Live Exercise”, an “Operation”: “This is not about retribution… This matter is going forward — we are in a live exercise here to get this right.”
To which president Trump retorted “you should have told us”.
Those words will go down in history.
Imagine you are living in a world that you are told is a democracy – and you may even believe it – but in fact your life and fate is in the hands of a few ultra-rich, ultra-powerful and ultra-inhuman oligarchs. They may be called Deep State, or anything else obscure or untraceable – it doesn’t matter. They are less than the 0.0001%.
For lack of a better expression, let’s call them for now “The Two Families”. The two families have, over the decades, created a “Network of Power”- which contains within it a collection of banks, central banks, corporations, think tanks, foundations and various multi-lateral entities. These two families are the Rockefeller and Rothschild families. The Rockefeller family is based in New York, and the Rothschild family is based in London. Each family has many other super-rich families allied to it. This alliance of families, along with its associated companies, banks, and entities is called a “Network of Power”. Each network of power has a leadership, and this leadership is headed by the wealthiest and most powerful family – either the Rothschild or the Rockefeller family. These two families make the policy, and the rest of the group follows this.
Well, that is sort of like, if North Korea invaded South Korea with all available troops, and a-bombs, and they had killed 5,000 people already, the Prime Minister of South Korea said “This is not a war, it’s a live exercise. It’s an operation”. He might try to signal that he was above the situation, but would that be percieved as a correct choice of words?
Bombshell about ordinary flu vaccines
A medical study at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center – not antiwaxers! has found that women who received flu vaccines had a weakened immune system response in subsequent years.
Lisa Christian, PhD, the lead researcher on the study, concluded, “Growing evidence shows that those who received a flu shot in the prior year have lower antibody responses in the current year.”
The study proves yet again that the official narrative of the flu shot industry — and its complicit corporate-run media — is false and deliberately deceptive. Far from offering bulletproof protection, flu shots actually make people more vulnerable to influenza infections, which of course contributes to more people catching the flu and then falsely thinking they need more flu shots for “more protection.”
Yet it is the flu shots themselves that are leading to an increase in influenza infections. The flu vaccine, in other words, perpetuates the myth that flu vaccines are needed by ensuring influenza spreads more rapidly than would otherwise occur. In effect, flu vaccines spread the very infections that generate more demand for flu vaccines. The structure is a “perfect” self-perpetuating medical hoax rooted in fake science and relentless media propaganda.
Please watch this video for more information on this:
UN says new polio outbreak in Sudan caused by oral vaccineAssociated Press news story published on September 2, 2020 Source: https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-health-middle-east-africa-united-nations-619efb65b9eeec5650f011b960a152e9#:~:text=LONDON%20(AP)%20%E2%80%94%20The%20World,of%20the%20wild%20polio%20virus.
FILE – In this Wednesday April 24, 2013 file photo, a Somali child receives a polio vaccine, at the Medina Maternal Child Health center in Mogadishu, Somalia. The World Health Organization says a new polio outbreak in Sudan is linked to an ongoing vaccine-sparked epidemic in Chad – a week after the U.N. health agency declared the African continent free of wild polio virus. In a statement Wednesday, Sept. 2020, WHO said two children in Sudan – one from South Darfur state and the other from Gedarif state, close to the border with Ethiopia and Eritrea – were paralyzed in March and April. Both had been recently vaccinated against polio. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis, file)
Text snippet wording:
LONDON (AP) — The World Health Organization says a new polio outbreak in Sudan is linked to an ongoing vaccine-sparked epidemic in Chad — a week after the U.N. health agency declared the African continent free of the wild polio virus.
In a statement this week, WHO said two children in Sudan — one from South Darfur state and the other from Gedarif state, close to the border with Ethiopia and Eritrea — were paralyzed in March and April. Both had been recently vaccinated against polio. WHO said initial outbreak investigations show the cases are linked to an ongoing vaccine-derived outbreak in Chad that was first detected last year and is now spreading in Chad and Cameroon.
Full credits to Inessa S’s channel.
EX-RUSSIAN INTEL OFFICER: Depopulation agenda is real |
A former Colonel of the Russian Military Intelligence service states that the current Coronavirus pandemic is serving 4 main purposes:
1) Depopulation initiative
2) Political control over the remaining population
3) Deflation of the current financial bubble
4) Liquidation of geo-economic competitors